Published in Science in 2015 (OA), the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (PDF and HTML) include eight modular standards, each with three levels of increasing stringency. Journals select which of the eight transparency standards they wish to implement and select a level of implementation for each. These features provide flexibility for adoption depending on disciplinary variation, but simultaneously establish community standards.
Standards: Data Citation | Data, Materials, and Code Transparency | Design and Analysis | Preregistration | Replication
Levels: Disclose, Require, or Verify
Journal policies can be evaluated based on the degree to which they comply with the TOP Guidelines. This TOP Factor is a metric that reports the steps that a journal is taking to implement open science practices, practices that are based on the core principles of the scientific community. It is an alternative way to assess journal qualities, and is an improvement over traditional metrics that measure mean citation rates. The TOP Factor is transparent (see underlying data and the evaluation rubric) and will be responsive to community feedback.
Read more about TOP Factor here.
With over 5,000 signatories, the TOP Guidelines are a widely used tool for implementing open science practices.
Journal signatories have expressed their support of the principles of openness, transparency, and reproducibility, expressing interest in the guidelines and commit to conducting a review within a year of the standards and levels of adoption.
Organization signatories have expressed their support of the principles of openness, transparency, and reproducibility and encouraging associated journals to conduct a review of the standards and levels of adoption.
As of 2020, we are no longer adding signatories to this list as we focus on implementation of the policies covered in TOP and evaluate journal practices through TOP Factor.
For inquiries, please contact David Mellor or email top@cos.io.
| Not Implemented | Level I | Level II | Level III | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citation Standards | No mention of data citation. | Journal describes citation of data in guidelines to authors with clear rules and examples. | Article provides appropriate citation for data and materials used consistent with journal's author guidelines. | Article is not published until providing appropriate citation for data and materials following journal's author guidelines. |
| Data Transparency | Journal encourages data sharing, or says nothing. | Article states whether data are available, and, if so, where to access them. | Data must be posted to a trusted repository. Exceptions must be identified at article submission. | Data must be posted to a trusted repository, and reported analyses will be reproduced independently prior to publication. |
| Analytic Methods (Code) Transparency | Journal encourages code sharing, or says nothing. | Article states whether code is available, and, if so, where to access it. | Code must be posted to a trusted repository. Exceptions must be identified at article submission. | Code must be posted to a trusted repository, and reported analyses will be reproduced independently prior to publication. |
| Research Materials Transparency | Journal encourages materials sharing, or says nothing. | Article states whether materials are available, and, if so, where to access them. | Materials must be posted to a trusted repository. Exceptions must be identified at article submission. | Materials must be posted to a trusted repository, and reported analyses will be reproduced independently prior to publication. |
| Design and Analysis Transparency | Journal encourages design and analysis transparency, or says nothing. | Journal articulates design transparency standards. | Journal requires adherence to design transparency standards for review and publication. | Journal requires and enforces adherence to design transparency standards for review and publication. |
| Study Preregistration | Journal says nothing. | Article states whether preregistration of study exists, and, if so, where to access it. | Article states whether preregistration of study exists, and, if so, allows journal access during peer review for verification. | Journal requires preregistration of studies and provides link and badge in article to meeting requirements. |
| Analysis Plan Preregistration | Journal says nothing. | Article states whether preregistration of study exists, and, if so, where to access it. | Article states whether preregistration with analysis plan exists, and, if so, allows journal access during peer review for verification. | Journal requires preregistration of studies with analysis plans and provides link and badge in article to meeting requirements. |
| Replication | Journal discourages submission of replication studies, or says nothing. | Journal encourages submission of replication studies. | Journal encourages submission of replication studies and conducts results blind review. | Journal uses Registered Reports as a submission option for replication studies with peer review prior to observing the study outcomes. |
Read the complete TOP Guidelines PDF or wiki
Download the summary table for journals or funders.
For inquiries, please contact David Mellor or email top@cos.io.
Thousands of journals have implemented one or more of the TOP Guidelines. See TOP Factor for a comprehensive list and find examples in your discipline. Below are a few exemplars.
Funders are also implementing open science policies around preregistration and Registered Reports, open data and materials, and preprints or open access.
With over 5,000 signatories, the TOP Guidelines are a widely used tool for implementing open science practices.
Journal signatories have expressed their support of the principles of openness, transparency, and reproducibility, expressing interest in the guidelines and commit to conducting a review within a year of the standards and levels of adoption.
Organization signatories have expressed their support of the principles of openness, transparency, and reproducibility and encouraging associated journals to conduct a review of the standards and levels of adoption.
Please note that as of the end of 2020, we are no longer adding signatories to this list. If you are interested in implementing TOP, please see the corresponding tab on this page, as well as TOP Factor.
For inquiries, please contact David Mellor or email top@cos.io.
The TOP Guidelines are a community-driven and evolving effort, changing to meet the needs of the community while pursuing the most transparent practices. The TOP Advisory Board is charged with the ongoing maintenance and outreach for the Guidelines. It encourages adoption and implementation of the Guidelines through education, communication, and outreach. The Board will evaluate adoption and effectiveness of the Guidelines and use this information, along with feedback from the stakeholder community, to improve them. Bylaws for the Advisory Board can be found here.
University of Oregon | Chair | 2023 - 2025
The Declaration on Research Assessment | 2023 - 2024
210 Ridge McIntire Road
Suite 500
Charlottesville, VA 22903-5083
Email: contact@cos.io
Unless otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.
Responsible stewards of your support
COS has earned top recognition from Charity Navigator and Candid (formerly GuideStar) for our financial transparency and accountability to our mission. COS and the OSF were also awarded SOC2 accreditation in 2023 after an independent assessment of our security and procedures by the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA).
We invite all of our sponsors, partners, and members of the community to learn more about how our organization operates, our impact, our financial performance, and our nonprofit status.
