The Reproducibility Project: Psychology was a collaborative effort of 270 contributors to replicate 100 important findings in the psychology literature. RP:P began in November 2011, finished primary data collection in December 2014, and published its findings in Science magazine on August 28, 2015. After the results were published, people from around the world engaged in conversations about the impact of this study on reproducibility and transparency.

Find out more about the project through the following news stories or explore additional articles, podcasts, and radio stories in this list.



The New York Times

"Many Psychology Findings Not as Strong as Claimed, Study Says”

by Benedict Carey

The Washington Post
“Many scientific studies can’t be replicated. That’s a problem.” 

by Joel Achenbach

WIRED
“Science Has Its Problems, But the Web Could Be the Fix” 

by Katie M. Palmer

The Atlantic
”How Reliable Are Psychology Studies?” 

by Ed Yong 

Reddit Science AMA Series

We are authors of "Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science" coordinated by the Center for Open Science, AUA

Vox
Scientists often fail when they try to replicate studies. This psychologist explains why.

by Julia Belluz

FiveThirtyEight
Psychology Is Starting To Deal With Its Replication Problem

by Christie Aschwanden


Science Friday

http://www.sciencefriday.com/segment/08/28/2015/putting-scientific-research-to-the-test.html


Putting Scientific Research to the Test

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.