Advocating for Policy Improvements at Your Institution

August 30th, 2019, David Mellor, Claire Riss

Advocating for Policy Improvements at Your Institution - hero

Perhaps you’re in a scientific field that needs nurtured toward open and reproducible practices but you’re not sure how to approach policy and decision makers about implementing these practices. You’re aware of the problem(s). You want to see change. But where’s the best place to start?

On August 22, 2019, a panel of open policy advocates gathered to discuss the tools and methods they’ve relied upon to successfully advocate for institutional policy improvements. We invite you to take advantage of the resources and insights they shared in this webinar:

Advocating for Change in How Science is Conducted to Level the Playing Field - youtube

As discussed by the panel, open practice community advocates can unite to more strategically influence scientific institutions (journals, funders, universities, etc.) toward transparency and openness. To start, here are two community-led techniques all policy advocates can participate in and glean from:

  1. Registered Reports Now! — an initiative to influence journals toward open publishing using the Registered Reports publishing format. The project is a centralized effort to contact journals, coordinate the outreach efforts of advocates, record responses from journals, and track the progress of the open publishing landscape.

  2. Take up TOP! — a crowdsourced project in beta testing that promotes the adoption of TOP Guidelines and practices by journals through community-led auditing and scoring tools.

Achieving culture change at your institution can be a challenge, but you don’t have to do it alone. Policy advocates across disciplines are working together to foster best practices within their institutions, while contributing to an advanced aggregation of effective resources. 

To date, more than 1,000 journals have implemented at least one TOP Guideline. In the case of the Take up TOP! initiative alone, project leaders evaluated several journals within the pain research community (Lee et al., 2018), which led to a better alignment with data sharing policies in one of the leading journals (Keefe et al., 2018).

Change is taking place, and it's being driven forward by community advocates like you.

Looking to learn more about institutional policy improvements in the scientific field? Visit for information about TOP Guidelines, or contact COS Director of Policy Initiatives David Mellor at for further information about implementing transparent and open policies at your institution.

Keefe, F. J., Ballantyne, J., Blyth, F., Coghill, R. C., Dickenson, A., Dionne, C. E., … Sluka, K. (2018). Publishing the best basic and applied pain science: Open science and PAIN. Pain, 159(3), 405–406.
Lee, H., Lamb, S. E., Bagg, M. K., Toomey, E., Cashin, A. G., & Moseley, G. L. (2018). Reproducible and replicable pain research: A critical review. PAIN, 159(9), 1683.

Recent Blogs

The Content of Open Science

What Second Graders Can Teach Us About Open Science

What's Going on With Reproducibility?

Open Science and the Marketplace of Ideas

3 Things Societies Can Do to Promote Research Integrity

How to Manage and Share Your Open Data

Interview with Prereg Challenge Award Winner Dr. Allison Skinner

Next Steps for Promoting Transparency in Science

Public Goods Infrastructure for Preprints and Innovation in Scholarly Communication

A How-To Guide to Improving the Clarity and Continuity of Your Preregistration

Building a Central Service for Preprints

Three More Reasons to Take the Preregistration Challenge

The Center for Open Science is a Culture Change Technology Company

Preregistration: A Plan, Not a Prison

How can we improve diversity and inclusion in the open science movement?

OSF Fedora Integration, Aussie style!

Replicating a challenging study: it's all about sharing the details.

How Preregistration Helped Improve Our Research: An Interview with Preregistration Challenge Awardees

Some Examples of Publishing the Research That Actually Happened

Are reproducibility and open science starting to matter in tenure and promotion review?

The IRIS Replication Award and Collaboration in the Second Language Research Community

We Should Redefine Statistical Significance

Some Cool New OSF Features

How Open Source Research Tools Can Help Institutions Keep it Simple

OSF Add-ons Help You Maximize Research Data Storage and Accessibility

10 Tips for Making a Great Preregistration

Community-Driven Science: An Interview With EarthArXiv Founders Chris Jackson, Tom Narock and Bruce Caron

A Preregistration Coaching Network

Why are we working so hard to open up science? A personal story.

One Preregistration to Rule Them All?

Using the wiki just got better.

Transparent Definitions and Community Signals: Growth in the Open Science Community

We're Committed to GDPR. Here's How.

Preprints: The What, The Why, The How.

The Prereg Challenge Is Ending. What's Next?

We are Now Registering Preprint DOIs with Crossref

Using OSF in the Lab

Psychology's New Normal

How Open Commenting on Preprints Can Increase Scientific Transparency: An Interview With the Directors of PsyArxiv, SocArxiv, and Marxiv

The Landscape of Open Data Policies

Open Science is a Behavior.

Why pre-registration might be better for your career and well-being

Interview: Randy McCarthy discusses his experiences with publishing his first Registered Report

Towards minimal reporting standards for life scientists

Looking Back on the Prereg Challenge and Forward To More Credible Research

OSF: Origin, growth, and what’s next

A Critique of the Many Labs Projects

The Rise of Open Science in Psychology, A Preliminary Report

Strategy for Culture Change

New OSF Registries Enhancements Improve Efficiency and Quality of Registrations

Registered Reports and PhD’s – What? Why? How? An Interview with Chris Chambers

How to Collaborate with Industry Using Open Science

How to Build an Open Science Network in Your Community

Seven Reasons to Work Reproducibly

COS Collaborates with Case Medical Research to Support Free Video Publishing for Clinicians and Researchers

Advocating for Policy Improvements at Your Institution

Announcing a joint effort to improve research transparency: FAIRSharing and TOP Guidelines

OSF as a tool for managing course-embedded research projects

Journals test the Materials Design Analysis Reporting (MDAR) checklist

Now you can endorse papers on OSF Preprints with Plaudit

Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement

Approach and vision for the OSF Preprint infrastructure

Conflict between Open Access and Open Science: APCs are a key part of the problem, preprints are a key part of the solution

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.