OSF: Origin, growth, and what’s next

May 14th, 2019, Nicole Pfeiffer

Posted in Technology

150 user infographic header

Over 150,000 users have joined OSF, a milestone on the journey towards open and reproducible research. This provides an opportunity to thank many who have contributed to this progress, and to highlight some of the things coming next.

In early 2013, OSF was a self-funded lab project with just 371 users.  But, with support from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation (now Arnold Ventures), we spun out OSF into a non-profit called the Center for Open Science with a mission: to increase the openness, integrity, and reproducibility of research.  We committed ourselves to building public goods infrastructure for researchers looking to increase the rigor, transparency, and reproducibility of their research. Over the past 6 years, we’ve developed and improved OSF to meet more researchers’ needs for collaborating and sharing their work. Those 371 users grew to 6,700 by the end of 2014, doubled to 13,700 by 2016, and reached 100,000 users in 2018. It took 4 years to get the first 50,000 users; it took 10 months to get the latest 50,000 users.

Stuart Buck, Arnold Ventures Vice President of Research, notes, “As the initial funder of the Center for Open Science and OSF, we are extraordinarily proud to see how far they’ve come in the past six years, not the least because this is such a strong sign that open science practices have been spreading. At Arnold Ventures, we ourselves use OSF to provide transparency into the external research that we fund, and we look forward to its continued growth and usage.”

COS couldn’t deliver OSF without the generous support of our sponsors, partners, and our team. Most importantly, OSF wouldn’t be what it is without our dedicated users, who continually share with us their ideas for improving OSF to make their research process more transparent, robust, and efficient. This is a collaborative effort, combining strengths of researchers from 229 countries around the world. 

150k user world

Felix Schoenbrodt of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München is one such user. "I’ve used the OSF since 2014, and I can’t imagine doing research without it. Then, many collaborators did not know of this platform, and sometimes it took some time to convince them to sign up - but now it’s not a question. My colleagues have embraced OSF, and together we’ve made our research more efficient, more transparent, and more discoverable.”

User growth graph

As our journey continues, OSF will get a facelift this year. Key pages will be redesigned to improve the user experience, make navigation easier, and add exciting new features. Some (highly requested!) features to look forward to:

  • Additional metadata on files, to comply with FAIR standards

  • Permissions groups, to make managing large teams on OSF more efficient

  • Guided submission process for creating preregistrations on OSF, to lower the barrier to preregistering research  

To see more about our near and long term product development themes, visit our Public Roadmap.

registration submission mockup

Development of a new guided submission workflow for preregistering research on OSF is underway.

OSF is free to use, but it’s not free to build or maintain. If you have benefitted from OSF, consider making a donation. Your gift will allow us to continue improving OSF, expanding features, and creating new services to positively impact the scientific community.

Recent Blogs

The Content of Open Science

What Second Graders Can Teach Us About Open Science

What's Going on With Reproducibility?

Open Science and the Marketplace of Ideas

3 Things Societies Can Do to Promote Research Integrity

How to Manage and Share Your Open Data

Interview with Prereg Challenge Award Winner Dr. Allison Skinner

Next Steps for Promoting Transparency in Science

Public Goods Infrastructure for Preprints and Innovation in Scholarly Communication

A How-To Guide to Improving the Clarity and Continuity of Your Preregistration

Building a Central Service for Preprints

Three More Reasons to Take the Preregistration Challenge

The Center for Open Science is a Culture Change Technology Company

Preregistration: A Plan, Not a Prison

How can we improve diversity and inclusion in the open science movement?

OSF Fedora Integration, Aussie style!

Replicating a challenging study: it's all about sharing the details.

Some Examples of Publishing the Research That Actually Happened

How Preregistration Helped Improve Our Research: An Interview with Preregistration Challenge Awardees

Are reproducibility and open science starting to matter in tenure and promotion review?

The IRIS Replication Award and Collaboration in the Second Language Research Community

We Should Redefine Statistical Significance

Some Cool New OSF Features

How Open Source Research Tools Can Help Institutions Keep it Simple

OSF Add-ons Help You Maximize Research Data Storage and Accessibility

10 Tips for Making a Great Preregistration

Community-Driven Science: An Interview With EarthArXiv Founders Chris Jackson, Tom Narock and Bruce Caron

A Preregistration Coaching Network

Why are we working so hard to open up science? A personal story.

One Preregistration to Rule Them All?

Using the wiki just got better.

Transparent Definitions and Community Signals: Growth in the Open Science Community

We're Committed to GDPR. Here's How.

Preprints: The What, The Why, The How.

The Prereg Challenge Is Ending. What's Next?

We are Now Registering Preprint DOIs with Crossref

Using OSF in the Lab

Psychology's New Normal

How Open Commenting on Preprints Can Increase Scientific Transparency: An Interview With the Directors of PsyArxiv, SocArxiv, and Marxiv

The Landscape of Open Data Policies

Open Science is a Behavior.

Why pre-registration might be better for your career and well-being

Interview: Randy McCarthy discusses his experiences with publishing his first Registered Report

Towards minimal reporting standards for life scientists

Looking Back on the Prereg Challenge and Forward To More Credible Research

OSF: Origin, growth, and what’s next

A Critique of the Many Labs Projects

The Rise of Open Science in Psychology, A Preliminary Report

Strategy for Culture Change

New OSF Registries Enhancements Improve Efficiency and Quality of Registrations

Registered Reports and PhD’s – What? Why? How? An Interview with Chris Chambers

How to Collaborate with Industry Using Open Science

How to Build an Open Science Network in Your Community

Seven Reasons to Work Reproducibly

COS Collaborates with Case Medical Research to Support Free Video Publishing for Clinicians and Researchers

Advocating for Policy Improvements at Your Institution

Announcing a joint effort to improve research transparency: FAIRSharing and TOP Guidelines

OSF as a tool for managing course-embedded research projects

Journals test the Materials Design Analysis Reporting (MDAR) checklist

Now you can endorse papers on OSF Preprints with Plaudit

Many Labs 4: Failure to Replicate Mortality Salience Effect With and Without Original Author Involvement

Approach and vision for the OSF Preprint infrastructure

Conflict between Open Access and Open Science: APCs are a key part of the problem, preprints are a key part of the solution

Re-engineering Ethics Training: An Interview with Dena Plemmons and Erica Baranski

Answering Your Preregistration Questions

UBC leads the way as first Canadian institutional OSF member

2019 Recap: OSF Growth and Open Knowledge Exchange

Getting Started with OSF

This website relies on cookies to help provide a better user experience. By clicking Accept or continuing to use the site, you agree. For more information, see our Privacy Policy and information on cookie use.