The Center for Open Science (COS) is conducting a 3-year research and development project on a new model of scholarly communication called Lifecycle Journal to evaluate its strengths and weaknesses and suitability for transition into a scalable and sustainable solution.
1
|
The Lifecycle Journal will meet authors’ existing needs of the current reward system for publication, and will create pathways to realign that reward system with values of rigor, transparency, and integrity. It will include rigorous peer review with highly credible editorial leadership. |
2
|
The Lifecycle Journal will incorporate existing innovations that are improving scholarly communication including Diamond Open Access; Publish-then-Review; Transparent and Open Peer Review; Open and FAIR data, materials, and code; CRediT taxonomy; and, Registered Reports. |
3
|
The Lifecycle Journal will introduce innovations that will transform the vision and value of journals into effective facilitators of knowledge production and self-correction. These innovations will include incorporating several human, machine, and empirical evaluations in a dynamic marketplace of credibility assessments; versioning and updated review of published papers and other outputs; treating data, materials, and code as first-class scholarly outputs; and, publication beginning at any stage of the research lifecycle. |
4
|
The Lifecycle Journal aims to put the operation and innovation in publishing and the reward system in the control of the scholarly community itself with community-based governance, scholar-led editorial teams, public goods infrastructure, and integrated metascience for continuous experimentation, evaluation, and improvement. |
With the Open Science Framework (OSF), COS provides a solution for research producers to open up their research from conception through completion to promote transparency, sharing, and rigor.
The Lifecycle Journal is the conceptual complement of OSF to facilitate the interaction between researchers as producers and consumers to promote credibility assessment, reproducibility, reuse, and self-correction. The combination will align scholarly communication with scholarly values and accelerate knowledge production.
The early adopter authors of the Lifecycle Journal will get substantial engagement with their research, and help shape the future of the model. Authors can submit research plans or completed reports. Authors will receive assessments from a marketplace of evaluations, and engage in scholarly discourse about one’s approach, evidence, and claims. Any area of scholarship that is represented by at least one peer review service associated with the Lifecycle Journal is eligible for submission.
Several of the review services offer opportunities for scholars to contribute their expertise for evaluating research — from the familiar peer review of completed reports to experimental methods in assessment. Examples of participating evaluation services are listed above. Sign up for updates and information about how to participate as a reviewer or evaluator for one or more of the evaluation services.
Do you run an evaluation service for scholarly research, or do you have an innovative idea for how planned or completed research could be evaluated? Contact us to explore partnering in the marketplace of evaluation services. If you have conceived but not yet developed your approach to evaluation, you can still fill-out the form, and you are encouraged to consider applying for the Astera Institute Entrepreneur-in-Residence program.
Lifecycle Journal is COS’s next major experiment to advance its mission to increase openness, integrity, and reproducibility of research, and its vision for achieving it (COS: Strategic Plan).
We envision a future scholarly community in which:
Achieving the mission requires culture change in the incentives that drive researchers’ behavior, the infrastructure that supports research, and the business models that dominate scholarly communication.
This Lifecycle Journal experiment will be a collaborative project among a community of scholars and service providers. Join us to push the innovation envelope by developing and testing a scalable, transformational model for scholarly communication and publishing.
210 Ridge McIntire Road
Suite 500
Charlottesville, VA 22903-5083
Email: contact@cos.io
Unless otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.
Responsible stewards of your support
COS has earned top recognition from Charity Navigator and Candid (formerly GuideStar) for our financial transparency and accountability to our mission. COS and the OSF were also awarded SOC2 accreditation in 2023 after an independent assessment of our security and procedures by the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA).
We invite all of our sponsors, partners, and members of the community to learn more about how our organization operates, our impact, our financial performance, and our nonprofit status.